|
Summary It has been more than 300 years since the law of gravity was established and, surprisingly, not a single piece of evidence has emerged to prove that the law of gravity is correct. Examples of errors in the establishment of the law of gravity show that the law of gravity is not a true result of natural science and is wrong. The elimination of the erroneous law of gravity would overthrow the basis of astro-scientific research, and one should find conclusive reasons for the phenomena produced by natural variations in nature, and draw conclusions that will become the basis of astro-scientific research today and in the future. For example, the phenomenon that a magnet rotates and does not rotate in space, it is concluded that all objects around the Earth are charged particles in the Earth's magnetic field, and the charged particles are subjected to the Lorentz force in the Earth's magnetic field to move in a uniform circular motion around the Earth. Pushing scientific research to new frontiers. We look forward to people's wise judgement and choice of the right path that can produce fruitful scientific research results. Keywords. Velocity; Spiral; Ellipse; Accurate measurements；Rotation; rotation Main text (as opposed to footnotes) The law of gravity was first proposed by the great scientist Isaac Newton in his book Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, published in 1687. Volume III of the Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy states: "Lastly, if it universally appeurs, by experiments and astronomical obser-vations, that all bodies about the earth gravitate towards the earth, and that in proportion to the quantity of matter which they severally contain:that the moon likewise, according to the quaatity of its matter, gravitatee towards the earth; that, on the other hand, our sea gravitates towards thc moon; and all the planets mutually one towards another; and the comets in like manner towards the sun; we must, in consequence of this rule, uni-versally allow that all bodies whatsoever are endowed with a principle ot mutual gravitation. For the urgument from the appearances concludes with more force for the universal gravitation of all bodies than for their impen. … ·". Newton proposed a theory of gravity, but failed to arrive at a formula for gravity. In 1687, when Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy was published, Newton stated that the gravitational attraction between any two bodies was satisfied: F∝m1m2/r2 The gravitational constant G was soon calculated, F ∝ Gm1m2/r2 Since then, the law of gravity has been fully developed. It took Isaac Newton 20 years, from 1665 to 1685, to trace the evolution of the concepts of centrifugal force - centripetal force - gravitational force - gravity, and finally to arrive at the concept and term 'gravity'. Newton's proposed law of universal gravitation was not a summary of the natural laws of nature discovered by Newton, but rather Newton's conjecture based on reasoning about natural phenomena with unknown mechanisms in nature. Therefore, the law of gravity was not recognised and used for the first 100 years of its existence. In 1789, more than a hundred years after Newton proposed the law of gravity, the British physicist Henry Cavendish cleverly used the torsion balance to measure the gravitational constant in the laboratory for the first time. On 23 September 1846, using mathematical predictions, he accidentally discovered a new planet - Neptune. Neptune. The discovery of Neptune removed all doubt about the law of gravity and established it as a cornerstone of physics. It has been more than 300 years since the law of gravity was created, and there has not been a single case of evidence to prove that the law of gravity is correct. Therefore,recognised the status of the law of gravity for use in physics. Cavendish's torsion-weighing experiment does not prove that the law of gravity is correct. What is the logical relationship between the gravitational constant measured by Cavendish and the law of gravity? The Cavendish torsion balance experiment is not a summary of the laws of nature, it is not an expression of the law! The experiment does not explain why the force between the large ball and the small ball is the force of gravity? How do you know that a force between substances is gravity? Cavendish's twisted claim that the experiment describes a force that comes from an unknown source and is indistinguishable from gravity is a generalisation and a false exaggeration! It is unscientific, inaccurate and absurd! Cavendish only experimented with a lead balloon, not with any other object, so his experiment has no general applicability! No reliability! No conclusive factuality! No regularity! Therefore it cannot be used as evidence at all!Cavendish just take the lead ball this kind of material experiment, a material experiment is a gravitational force is not gravity, a material between the gravitational force between the lonely case event exaggerated in "any two objects are mutually attractive" gravity, explained: Cavendish torsion scales experiments are false, all-encompassing, fraudulent deception of the people! Props! He should have used the scientific method to experiment with many other objects as control groups. For example: watermelon and egg, onion and tomato, rock and firewood, ------ etc. From the many factual examples of phenomena, find the conclusive causes and generally applicable laws! And show how they logically relate to Newton's law of gravity! Listing phenomena is only one step in the process of forming a law; phenomena are not equivalent to laws! It's like saying that a house is made up of building materials such as bricks and mortar, but the building materials are not the house. The discovery of Neptune is not proof that the law of gravity is correct, the discovery of Neptune, although known as the results of calculations under the nib of the practical observation of the discovery of Neptune, the discovery of Neptune, and the young French astronomer Urbain Le Verrier predicted the position of less than 1 °, but with the University of Cambridge, England, mathematics student John Couch Adams predicted the position of the difference of 10 ° [1]. 1821, people found that Uranus actual orbit and the law of gravity calculated the theoretical orbit has a large discrepancy between the "ingress" phenomenon caused various speculation. The law of gravity calculated the theoretical orbit of Uranus has a large difference, there is a phenomenon called "ingress" "derailment", caused people to carry out a variety of speculation ------. The large discrepancy between the theoretical orbits calculated using the law of gravity and the actual orbits of the planets shows that the discovery of Neptune not only does not prove that the law of gravity is correct, but it proves that the law of gravity is incorrect and wrong. I. Errors in the establishment of the law of gravity Newton argued, on the basis of the laws of motion, that if the mass of the planet is m, the radius of its orbit is R, and its period of revolution is T, then this gravitational force, F, should satisfy the following relation F=mRω2=mR(2π/T)2=4mRπ2/T2 To remove T from the equation, leaving only m and R, Newton used Kepler's third law and inserted T2=R3/K into the above equation to obtain F=4π2Km/R2 Newton also argued that K is a quantity related to the solar mass M days, and that the 4π2K in the above equation can be replaced by the product of a constant G and M days, i.e. F = GmM days/R2 Newton generalised this gravitational force to arrive at the law of gravity: F=Gm1m2/r2 Kepler's third law reads: "The ratio of the cube of the semilong axis of the elliptical orbits of all the planets to the square of the period of revolution is equal. If the radius of the orbit is R and the period of revolution is T, Kepler's third law can be expressed by the following equation K=R3/T2 Figure 1 Now scientists after astronomical observations and the precise measurement of the planetary orbit has been confirmed: the speed of the Sun's rotation is 240km / s. Then the Sun rotates 1 year (365 days) is 75,686,400,000km. To illustrate the movement of the Sun as the centre, draw the orbit of the planets around the Sun, the movement of the numerical labels to highlight the scientific, it can be seen that the planetary orbit is a spiral shape, rather than an ellipse (Figure 1). and not elliptical (Figure 1). Kepler's law, which describes the orbits of the planets as spiral and elliptical, is itself an error, and Kepler's great ambition was to develop and perfect the heliocentric theory. Today, astronomical observations and precise measurements of the orbits of the planets have confirmed that the Sun is not the centre of the Universe, but that it is constantly moving around the centre of the Milky Way at a speed of 240 km/sec.The abolition of the 'Earth-centred theory' and the 'Sun-centred theory' is not the result of a difference in the frames of reference used by people, but rather the result of changes in the scientific and technological methods of astronomical observation and the updating of instrumentation. Planets in spiral orbits do not have cycles. According to geometry, a circular cycle is a closed curve, while a spiral orbit is not a closed curve, so planets do not have rotational cycles. Spiral orbits without periods are an error when calculated using the elliptical law with periods. The law of gravity established by Kepler's erroneous third law is wrong, and this error is an irrefutable error in the law of gravity. Ⅱ. If gravity is really a force, then there should be tools to measure the force, and those who blindly follow the law of gravity have no tools to measure the magnitude of gravity. If there is no tool to measure the magnitude of gravity, then gravity, like God without a tool to measure it, is a fictional consciousness with no basis in scientific fact, a religious belief in biblical occultism, and not a real scientific achievement. Many people will only mechanically and rigidly use the formula of the law of gravity to calculate the gravitational force between two objects, and no one will check whether the gravitational force between two objects is the same as the calculated result after the calculation. Technical testing is a very important basic step in scientific research, not doing technical testing is not based on scientific facts, not doing technical testing is the lack of professional ethics of scientific researchers, is able to be metaphysical, is academic malpractice, obviously self-deception! Ⅲ.There is a causal relationship between the cause and effect of natural changes, and the result of one event is the cause of another, and the development of cause and effect is continuous and uninterrupted. Newton wrote in The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, Volume III:'------ that all bodies about the earth gravitate towards the earth,For the urgument from the appearances concludes with more force for the universal gravitation of all bodies than for their impen.------'. The implication of this statement by Newton is that all objects around the Sun are attracted by the Sun's universal gravitation. Satellites move around the Earth by the Earth's gravity, and the Earth's satellites move around the Sun by the Sun's gravity at the same time as the Earth, so why can satellites only move around the Earth and not directly around the Sun? How can satellites scientifically tell which is the Earth's gravity and which is the Sun's gravity?The Moon, the International Space Station and the Earth are now gravitationally attracted to each other. Why does the Moon rotate and the ISS does not, if they are also attracted by gravitational interactions? From the two different natural phenomena of the Moon rotating and the ISS not rotating, it is clear that there is no gravitational interaction between the Moon, the ISS and the Earth. From the fact that the Moon rotates and the ISS does not, it is concluded that the law of gravity is wrong and that there is no gravity in nature. Conclusion The false law of gravity prevents the development of sustained research in accordance with the natural laws of nature, interactions, and cause-and-effect relationships in nature. Therefore, it is necessary to eliminate the false law of gravity and reverse the status of the law of gravity for use in the scientific study of celestial bodies. After the law of gravity is no longer used in the study of astro-science, people should find out the conclusive reasons for the phenomena caused by natural changes in nature and draw conclusions that will become the basis for the study of astro-science today and in the future.For example, if you take a magnet into space and see it spinning, the magnet will be deflected by the force of the surrounding magnetic field, which is common sense in physics. When people increase the magnet to 64[2], offset their own magnetic field force after the magnet is no longer deflected, by the United States Massachusetts Institute of Technology Professor Samuel C.C. Ting conceived the physical detection instrument Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) is built on the basis of this experiment. Therefore, it can be said that all objects around the Earth are subject to the Earth's magnetic force. Objects with stronger self-magnetic forces will rotate, and objects with weaker self-magnetic forces will not rotate. The reason the Moon rotates and the International Space Station does not rotate is that their magnetic forces are different. Moving electric charges produce magnetic fields, and magnetic fields exert magnetic forces on moving electric charges. All magnetic phenomena can be reduced to interactions between moving charges through magnetic field forces. This is the electric nature of magnetic phenomena. This is common sense physics. The magnets that people take into space can be thought of as moving charges, and the moving charges are subject to the force of the magnetic field.People take to space magnet compared with the powerful Earth can only be regarded as charged particles, so it can be said that: all objects around the Earth is the Earth's magnetic field of charged particles, charged particles in the Earth's magnetic field by the Lorentz force around the Earth and for uniform circular motion. Lorentz force only changes the direction of particle motion and does not change the speed of the particle, Lorentz force for the movement of the particle plays the role of centripetal force. This is the reason why objects around the Earth, such as the Moon and the International Space Station, rotate around the Earth and do not fall. Because the Lorentz force is always perpendicular to the direction of motion of the particles, the eight planets in the Solar System move regularly in the same plane around th
Sun; the Milky Way Galaxy within the many stars regularly move around the Milky Way Silver Centre in the same plane to form the Milky Way. Galaxies, stars and planets orbit regularly under the action of Lorentz forces generated by magnetic fields of different magnitudes, and two or more different magnetic fields generate interacting forces that cause the stars to rotate, which is why stars both rotate and spin without chaos.Newton believed that satellites could be launched in any direction of 360 ° above the ground, and Figure 2 is a schematic diagram drawn in his writings. Through the launch of satellites to make people realise that the direction of motion of high orbiting satellites must be the same as the direction of rotation of the Earth, and the direction of rotation with the Earth does not agree with the direction of high orbiting satellites will lead to the failure of the satellite launch. Through the examples in this paper, the rotation of magnets in space can be known that the Earth's rotation is due to the Earth itself has a magnetic force, the Earth's magnetic field will produce Lorentz force on the magnetic field of satellites, not gravity at all, so it can be said that: the law of gravity is wrong.Finding conclusive reasons in concrete examples and then drawing conclusions is the right way for the continuity of scientific research and development. Abandon the path of conjecture, the path of fiction without evidence, and choose the path of scientific research with solid evidence. Lorentz force and material electrons have a relationship, electrons and material atoms, molecules have a relationship, material molecules, atomic intervals, changes in the movement of the situation will make the material state changes, for example: Water solidification into ice, ice sublimation into water vapour, water vapour condensation into water and so on; Lorentz force has become the basis of celestial science research, people will use the Lorentz force and the composition of the substance of molecules, atoms, the nucleus, the natural relationship of electrons to study the cosmos in the universe, and the scientific development of the correct way. The mysteries of the origin of the Earth, the origin of neutron stars and black holes, the origin and evolution of the Sun, and so on, will be unravelled one by one, pushing scientific research to new frontiers. We look forward to people's wise judgement and choice of the right path that can produce fruitful scientific research results. Bibliography 1. Rev. J. Challis."Account of observations at the Cambridge observatory for detecting the planet exterior to Uranus[C]. Monthly Notices of the Royal.
|
30