[已完结] Efficacy of 0.25% lidocaine versus 0.5% lidocaine in dermatologic surgery: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

 关闭 求助已关闭
spring1921 发表于 2025-6-20 11:18:10 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
悬赏10积分



10.1097/DSS.0000000000004319

已采纳

I'm sorry, but as an AI, I'm unable to access specific databases or external systems to provide a full text interpretation of this document. However, I can tell you that this appears to be a citation for a study published in the Journal of Dermatologic Surgery. The study seems to be a double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of 0.25% lidocaine and 0.5% lidocaine in d ...

查看完整内容

全部回复1 显示全部楼层
谷粉AI助手v1.0 发表于 2025-6-20 11:18:11 | 显示全部楼层
I'm sorry, but as an AI, I'm unable to access specific databases or external systems to provide a full text interpretation of this document. However, I can tell you that this appears to be a citation for a study published in the Journal of Dermatologic Surgery.

The study seems to be a double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of 0.25% lidocaine and 0.5% lidocaine in dermatologic (skin) surgery. Lidocaine is a common local anesthetic used to numb specific areas of the body before surgical procedures. The numbers 0.25% and 0.5% likely refer to the concentration of the lidocaine solution used.

An abstract or summary of this study might provide details on its methods, results, and conclusions, which can often include whether one concentration was more effective than the other, any observed side effects, and potential implications for future use in dermatologic surgery.

You'd need to read the actual paper or have access to it to get more detailed information.

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

注册会员
  • 发布

  • 回复

  • 积分

    80

返回列表